Unlocking team performance: Using the Lencioni Model to identify and overcome challenges

In any team, performance ebbs and flows. But when results start slipping, it’s essential to understand why rather than just push harder. The Lencioni Model provides a simple yet powerful framework to help you diagnose issues at their root and take meaningful action.

Understanding the Lencioni Model

Patrick Lencioni’s Five Dysfunctions of a Team outlines the key challenges that prevent teams from reaching their full potential. These dysfunctions stack like a pyramid, meaning unresolved issues at the base weaken everything above.

The five dysfunctions are:

1. Lack of trust – The fear of being vulnerable prevents team members from building trust with each other.
2. Fear of conflict – The desire to keep the peace stifles productive conflict within the team.
3. Lack of commitment – The lack of clarity and/or buy-in prevents team members from making decisions they will stick to.
4. Avoidance of accountability – The need to avoid interpersonal discomfort prevents team members from holding each other accountable for their behaviors and performance.
5. Inattention to results – Pursuing individual goals and personal status distracts the team’s focus from collective results.

Simple scenarios to illustrate dysfunction

To better understand how these dysfunctions show up, let’s explore some common workplace scenarios.

Scenario 1: Lack of trust stalls progress

A sales team struggles with collaboration. Members hesitate to admit challenges because they fear judgment. As a result, information is siloed, and the team fails to capitalize on key opportunities. Solution: The manager implements weekly check-ins where team members share challenges openly, fostering a culture of trust.

Scenario 2: Fear of conflict creates confusion

During strategy meetings, a marketing team avoids debating ideas, leading to vague action plans. No one challenges unrealistic deadlines or unclear objectives, causing missed targets. Solution: The team leader introduces structured discussions where different viewpoints are encouraged, making decision-making more effective.

Scenario 3: Lack of commitment leads to missed deadlines

A product development team launches a new initiative, but after the meeting, team members aren’t sure what was decided. Some assume one approach, while others go in a different direction, delaying progress. Solution: The team agrees to document key takeaways and responsibilities after every meeting to ensure alignment.

Scenario 4: Avoiding accountability allows performance to slip

A retail store manager notices that team members aren’t meeting customer service standards, but no one addresses it directly. Instead, frustrations build, and morale drops. Solution: The manager sets clear expectations and holds regular feedback sessions to ensure accountability.

Scenario 5: Inattention to results hurts business growth

An operations team focuses on individual performance metrics rather than the company’s overall success. Some prioritize personal workload over team goals, causing inefficiencies. Solution: Leadership aligns incentives with company objectives and reinforces collective success.

Diagnosing team challenges

If your team’s results are suffering, the Lencioni Model can help pinpoint the issue. Start by asking:

• Are team members open about mistakes and weaknesses? (Trust)
• Do we engage in honest, productive debates? (Conflict)
• Is there clarity and buy-in on decisions? (Commitment)
• Do we hold each other accountable for expectations? (Accountability)
• Are we focused on collective results over individual success? (Results)

By reflecting on these areas, leaders and teams can identify weak spots and take targeted action.

Turning insights into action

Once you identify the root dysfunction, here’s how you can start improving:

• Building trust: Encourage open communication, vulnerability, and team-building activities.
• Embracing conflict: Foster a culture where diverse opinions are valued and debated constructively.
• Driving commitment: Clarify decisions and ensure alignment before moving forward.
• Strengthening accountability: Set clear expectations and hold regular check-ins.
• Focusing on results: Align goals, celebrate collective wins, and minimize distractions.

Challenges and limitations of the Lencioni Model

While the Lencioni Model is widely used and valuable, it does have limitations and potential challenges, including:

• Non-linear nature of dysfunction: The model presents dysfunctions in a hierarchical manner, but in reality, teams may experience them in different sequences or simultaneously, making it harder to diagnose a single root cause.
• Oversimplification of team dynamics: Human behavior and team interactions are complex. The model provides a structured way to assess dysfunctions but may not fully account for external factors like organizational culture, leadership changes, or market pressures.
• Dependence on leadership commitment: The model’s success relies heavily on leaders actively fostering trust, encouraging debate, and holding teams accountable. Without strong leadership, improvements can stall.
• Resistance to change: Teams accustomed to working a certain way may resist new approaches, making it challenging to implement necessary changes, particularly when dealing with conflict or accountability issues.
• Difficulty in measuring progress: Unlike key performance indicators (KPIs) or financial metrics, diagnosing and tracking improvements in trust, accountability, and conflict resolution can be subjective and hard to quantify.

The value of addressing dysfunction

Rather than treating symptoms, the Lencioni Model helps solve problems at their core. By improving team dynamics, businesses see increased collaboration, stronger decision-making, and ultimately, better results.

If your team isn’t achieving what it should, take a step back and assess where things might be breaking down. With the right focus and action, you can rebuild a foundation for success.

‍